首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of an intensive desensitisation, oral tolerance therapy and hunger provocation program for children who have had prolonged periods of tube feeds
【2h】

Evaluation of an intensive desensitisation, oral tolerance therapy and hunger provocation program for children who have had prolonged periods of tube feeds

机译:对长时间饲管的儿童进行强化脱敏,口服耐受治疗和饥饿刺激计划的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Some children with early feeding difficulties may require nasogastric, (NG) tube feeding or insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, (PEG) from a young age. A small cohort of these children can develop severe oral aversions that can delay the re-introduction of oral feeding. Multi-disciplinary approaches that provide an intensive approach are deemed the most effective method of intervention to reduce NG and PEG dependency.\ud\udMethod: Two children and their parents received an Intensive Approach to reduce PEG feeds, (Child A and Child B), whilst one child and her parents elected to receive a Traditional Feeding Clinic Approach, (Child C). The mean age of the participants was 4 years 4 months.\ud \udResults: Child A initially took 500 kcal (440% daily nutritional requirement) via her PEG, and 750 kcal (60% daily nutritional requirement) orally one week prior to the intensive programme, and Child B took 1200 kcal (100% daily nutritional requirement) via his PEG and O Kcal orally. Three months post the intervention, Child A took 100%all of her nutritional requirements orally, (1300 kcal/ 100% daily nutritional requirement), and Child B had reduced PEG requirement significantly to 38% oftook 500 kcal ( 50% daily nutritional requirement.) via his PEG, and 500 kcal orally. Child C showed no changes in PEG versus oral intake. \udChildren who received the intervention were able to remain focused on mealtimes for longermore, with fewer instances ofand did not leavinge the table. Parents altered their language styles post coaching on the intensive intervention with using fewer reprimands. No changes with these behaviours were noted with Child C.\ud\udConclusions: Although this was a small pilot study, there are some strategies used within an intensive multi-disciplinary context that can enable children to reduce their reliance on PEG feeds significantly.
机译:背景:一些早期喂养困难的儿童可能从小就需要鼻胃管(NG)喂养或经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)。这些孩子中的一小部分可能会出现严重的口腔反感,这可能会延迟重新引入口腔喂养。提供强化方法的多学科方法被认为是减少NG和PEG依赖性的最有效干预方法。\ ud \ ud方法:两个孩子及其父母接受了减少PEG饲料的强化方法(孩子A和孩子B) ,而一个孩子和她的父母选择接受传统的喂养诊所方法(孩子C)。结果:参与者A最初通过PEG服用500 kcal(每日营养需求量的440%),并在服用该药物之前的一周内口服750 kcal(每日营养需求量的60%)。强化计划,孩子B通过口服PEG和O Kcal服用了1200 kcal(每日100%的营养需求)。干预后三个月,儿童A口服了100%的所有营养需求(1300 kcal / 100%的每日营养需求),而儿童B的PEG需求显着降低至500 kcal的38%(每日50%的营养需求)。 )通过他的PEG,并且口服500 kcal。儿童C的PEG与口服摄入相比无变化。 \ ud接受干预的孩子们能够将注意力更多地集中在进餐时间上,减少了实例的发生并且没有离开餐桌。父母在强化干预后改变了语言风格,减少了谴责。结论:尽管这是一项小型先导研究,但在多学科的深入研究中使用了一些策略,可以使儿童显着减少对PEG饲料的依赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号